Abercrombie & Fitch Faces Lawsuit Over Alleged Funding of Sex-Trafficking Operation
Fashion giant Abercrombie & Fitch has been hit with a lawsuit in New York, alleging the brand's involvement in funding a sex-trafficking operation.
Documents indicate that the brand granted its former CEO, Mike Jeffries, unrestricted access to resources which allegedly facilitated his "criminal enterprise". This lawsuit comes in the wake of a BBC probe that unearthed accusations of Mr. Jeffries exploiting men during events while he was CEO.
While Abercrombie & Fitch has chosen to remain silent about the lawsuit, Brian H Bieber, representing Mr. Jeffries, stated that they would address the matter in court.
The allegations also extend to Mr. Jeffries' British partner, Matthew Smith, implicating him in charges of sex trafficking, sexual misconduct, and rape. There has been no comment from Mr. Smith at this time.
The case has been lodged under the New York Adult Survivors Act, allowing for the filing of civil sexual abuse claims that might have been barred by the statute of limitations. The lawsuit seeks class action status, potentially representing a substantial group of victims.
Brad Edwards, a civil attorney representing some of the alleged victims, expressed hope that the lawsuit would compel Abercrombie to take responsibility for actions that have allegedly harmed numerous young men.
Previously, following the BBC's investigative report, Abercrombie & Fitch conveyed their shock and dismay at Mr. Jeffries' alleged actions, while he refrained from commenting.
The lawsuit suggests that between 1992 and 2014, when Jeffries was the CEO, Abercrombie & Fitch was either aware or should have been cognizant of its role in financially fueling a sex trafficking scheme headed by Jeffries. Allegations state that Jeffries utilized the brand's resources, such as a corporate jet, transport, and ample funds to foster this operation and gain access to young adult men, including budding models.
Legal documents describe Abercrombie's prioritization of profits over ethics, turning a blind eye to Jeffries' alleged illicit actions, including disturbing accounts of his behavior captured on video. Despite being aware of the video's content, the company seemingly did not deter such behavior and reportedly continued to financially support Jeffries.
The unfolding of this case is awaited, as it bears significant implications for the brand and its legacy.
